omitted from 0.7%
this Bill.
(3) Part III as to Registered & Unregistered Brothels is taken from
the old Ord. of 1867 (4.42fc of H. 6.-2475-1880
218676. and though the word Licensed &
Unlicensed
are
altered to Registered
& Unregistered, the provisions really hardly altered at all - and the licensing is really retained under
another name.
And this goes a
great deal beyond the general principles
laid down in part 7 of despatch of Jul 1887 (p. 54gH634
Under the Straits Ord. any
brothel
may get itself Registered (subject to its obeying the Regulations under the Ord.) Except within prescribed
area
but this Hongkong Bill s.27(3) gives
power to refuse to register & s.28(1) speaks distinctly
of the Registrar General having power to refuse registration & 1.360 speaks.hintly
of Licensing pure & simple.
端
Again this Bill does not restrict
Part III to brothels occupied by Asiatic women
as the S. of State
directed.
1
ss. 38-45 as to proceedings against Unregistered Brothels should be I think
wholly omitted, & replaced by
as in s. 10/2 the Straits Ords which
such simple provisions
and 12/2) of the
provide for penalties against keepers of unregistered brothels, and give power
Where?
-188
1.54
to enter
any place reasonably suspected
of being a
brothel.
In that case 0.4
0.47.
would also
require to be amended into the form
of 10(3) of the Straits Ord. ...
Ilan
500
Hongkong people must be made to
understand that not merely
unregistered brothels but also registered brothels may be proceeded against, if they become
a
nuisance
n
latter.
to any
I that there
Nam
for shield protecting
(4) I doubt the necessity of Part II at all. The Lock Hospital like the other Hospitals will be provided for by annual Estimates & requires
If however
special Ordinance clauses are
to be retained,
I should like to correct their
phraseology in several points. contain no provision, as (5) 01.56-7 in Straits Ord, for Regulations being laid on table of Leg. Council, for that body to disapprove them if it thinks fit. (6) The Schedule & to Ordinance
B
does not repeal the whole Contagious Diseases Ord. 1867,
the
as we
4.6.347. 1889 proposed in par. 10 of despatch of Jul 1887
but retains ss. 30-33. I think they should have been repealed & reenacted, if required. They will
omitted from 0.7%
this Bill.
(3) Part III as to Registered & Unregistered Brothals is taken from
the old Ord. of 1867 (4.42fc of H. 6.-2475-1880
218676. and though the ward Licensed I
Unlicensed
AR
altered to Registered
are
+ Unregistered, the provisions really hardly altered at all - and the licensing is really retained under
another name.
And this going a
great deal beyond the general principles
laid down in part 7 of desk. of Jul 1887 (p. 54gH634
Under the Straits Ord. any
wothel
may get itself Registered (subject t its obeying the Rege under the Ord.) Except within prescribed
area
but this Humpking Bill s.27(3) giver
to refuse to register power repatrostal the Registrar General hover to repre and 1.360 speaks.h mintly
Licensing pure & simple.
端
Again this Bill does not restrict
Part III to brothel, occupied sichuring
as the S. of State
by Asiatic women
directed.
1
ss. 38-45 as to proceedings against Unregistered Brothels should be I think
I by some
wholly omitted, & replaced by
as in s. 10/2 the Straits Ords which
such simple provisions
and 12/2) of the
provide for penalties against keeper. of unregistered brothels, and give power
Where?
-188
1.54
to enter
any place reasonably suspected
brothel.
of being a
In that case 0.4
0.47.
would alov
require to be amended into the from
10(3) of the Straits Ord ...
Ilan
500
Hansking people must be made t
understand that not merely
be
unregistered brothals but also registered brotherls mas proceeded against, if they becom
a
muisance
n
latter.
to any
I that there
Nam
for shield protecting
(4) I doubt the necessity of Part II at all. The Lock Hospital like the other Hospitals will be provided für Ben annual Estimates I requires
If however
special Ord ce Mese clauses are
to be retamed,
Ishould like to correct their
phraseology in several points. contain no provisim, as (5) 01.56-7 in Straits Ord, for Regulations being laid on Euble of Leg. Commeil, for that body to disapprove them if it thinker fit. (6) The Schedule & to Ordinan
B
does not repeal the whole Contagions Diseases Ord. 1867,
the
as we
4.6.347. 1889 proposed in par. 10 of desp. of Jul 1887
but retains ss. 30-33. I think they should have been repealed I reenacted, if required. They will
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.